Dear Ex-drone,
I think it's interesting that up to this point, the only people reading my blog were friends, clients and well-wishers, but the second I post something that dares to challenge the NHP regulations I have comments from someone I don't know. Your post popped up about three hours after my original one - it's amazing to think that you were casually surfing the net without any agenda and just happened upon my little article!
I believe in transparency. Buckley is pretty blatant about his loyalties and where they lie and one has no doubt when speaking to him that this is a personal passion for him as well as a legal one. He spoke in depth about the Truehope case, so I did know that he was involved there. He also mentioned the three suicides that occurred immediately after a natural product that was used to help people with manic depression was taken away.
But I don't feel like it's my job to defend Buckley - he's a lawyer, he can handle that himself! I'm more interested in some of the information you have posted about NHPs and their removal from the shelves of health food stores. Of course on the surface, Canadians want the regulations: we were asked if NHPs should be tested for safety and efficacy and that sounds like a really good idea. But anyone who has ever looked at the application process has to admit that it is set up in a way that almost ensures failure. The "thousands of products" that have been passed through are almost all single ingredient products, mostly vitamins and minerals. The more complicated herbal formulas have to go through such an arduous procedure to be accepted that it looks impossible. NHPs such as single amino acids and glandular extracts are already disappearing. People are not as concerned as they should be because, as you nicely pointed out, the shelves look full. The large companies are not going to fold over these regulations, they will simply become dull and ineffective as they all make their own version of the same products. Innovation will die. New products imported from other countries will become non-existent.
As you mentioned, the regulations have been in effect since 2004, however the deadline - as you well know - is not until 2010. Thousands of applications are stuck in a backlog and it is anyone's guess (though I know where my money is) whether those will have gone through the process or not by next year. Many small companies are simply waiting until they are forced out. Is there a certain amount of self-interest here as you allege? Of course. This is their work, their livelihood, the way they feed their children and it is mine as well. You illustrate your point dramatically by comparing NHP regulations to the need for crumple zones and air bags in cars. Now I'm sure that if I could propel a bottle of dandelion root down a road at 100km per hour it would cause some damage worthy of the kind of restrictions it is facing. But at a couple drops under the tongue, I can't help but wonder what the real concern is.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Wednesday, March 18, 2009
Are You Free?
“Are you free?” At a presentation given by Shawn Buckley this past week in Kelowna he posed this question. Buckley is a lawyer who is probably best known for his work defending the manufacturers and producers of certain natural health products when they are threatened by Health Canada. He stated that as Canadians it is essential that we start thinking about health as a freedom issue.
The ability and freedom of each individual to choose how to care for his or her body is being slowly taken away. Under the NHP regulations (which you may have read about here weeks ago when I was ranting last!) we will lose an estimated 75% f our natural health products that are currently available. This has already begun as small to medium sized companies that can’t afford the kind of bureaucratic hoop-jumping that is required to apply for product licenses are closing their doors. Add to this the fact that roughly 20,000 American products have been withdrawn by companies unhappy with our weird new regulations and you can see how this is affecting your freedom to take care of your body right now.
One fun example of this: the company Organic Essentials was forced out of business because they could no longer afford the licensing fees after Health Canada decided to reclassify their organic tampons as a Class 2 medical device. Other companies have not yet closed their doors, but are playing a waiting game with Health Canada, aware that they could have their products removed from store shelves at any time after the looming 2010 deadline.
According to Buckley, one of the first steps required to fight this loss of freedom is a shift in attitude. People need to stop thinking of natural health products as something dangerous that we need to be protected from. If we look at our neighbours to the south, we see that NHPs are unregulated and can be purchased off the shelves of any Wal-Mart. They are only pulled off the shelf if they are proven dangerous – innocent until proven guilty. There is not a single documented case of death caused by an NHP in Canadian history, so why are we so worried? In contrast, nuts kill people every single year, often small children whose parents are not yet aware that they have allergies. Could you imagine taxpayers standing idly by while their money was used to fund Peanut Butter Regulation Boards and studies, eventually pulling nuts off the shelves or making them only available with a doctor’s permission?
Bill C-51 and C-52 were shouted down as people made their voices heard loud and clear that the kind of regulations and powers suggested within were unacceptable. Bill C-6 was introduced about a month ago and is basically C-52 reincarnate – the only real difference is that it no longer says that it applies specifically to NHPs. But Buckley points out that this Bill has some very scary things in it; including the loss of private property and the loss of the ‘rule of law’, the system that has been in place for hundreds of years to keep the state from abusing its power. It would only be a matter of time before these barbaric methods of control would be extended to health products, making all of us who choose herbs over prescriptions perspective criminals.
In response to this Bill and the NHP regulations, Buckley along with his colleagues Peter Helgrasson and Tiffany Sampson have formed the Natural Health Products Protection Agency (NHPPA). “We formed the NHPPA because the existing groups were not bringing enough attention to the issue.” The NHPPA provides a legitimate and credible analysis of documents like Bill C-51 and sets up a process that other groups can use to help spread information. Buckley grins as he mentions the time the Minister of Health called him a “scoundrel” in the National Post. Now if that isn’t evidence that they are on the right track, I don’t know what is.
The ability and freedom of each individual to choose how to care for his or her body is being slowly taken away. Under the NHP regulations (which you may have read about here weeks ago when I was ranting last!) we will lose an estimated 75% f our natural health products that are currently available. This has already begun as small to medium sized companies that can’t afford the kind of bureaucratic hoop-jumping that is required to apply for product licenses are closing their doors. Add to this the fact that roughly 20,000 American products have been withdrawn by companies unhappy with our weird new regulations and you can see how this is affecting your freedom to take care of your body right now.
One fun example of this: the company Organic Essentials was forced out of business because they could no longer afford the licensing fees after Health Canada decided to reclassify their organic tampons as a Class 2 medical device. Other companies have not yet closed their doors, but are playing a waiting game with Health Canada, aware that they could have their products removed from store shelves at any time after the looming 2010 deadline.
According to Buckley, one of the first steps required to fight this loss of freedom is a shift in attitude. People need to stop thinking of natural health products as something dangerous that we need to be protected from. If we look at our neighbours to the south, we see that NHPs are unregulated and can be purchased off the shelves of any Wal-Mart. They are only pulled off the shelf if they are proven dangerous – innocent until proven guilty. There is not a single documented case of death caused by an NHP in Canadian history, so why are we so worried? In contrast, nuts kill people every single year, often small children whose parents are not yet aware that they have allergies. Could you imagine taxpayers standing idly by while their money was used to fund Peanut Butter Regulation Boards and studies, eventually pulling nuts off the shelves or making them only available with a doctor’s permission?
Bill C-51 and C-52 were shouted down as people made their voices heard loud and clear that the kind of regulations and powers suggested within were unacceptable. Bill C-6 was introduced about a month ago and is basically C-52 reincarnate – the only real difference is that it no longer says that it applies specifically to NHPs. But Buckley points out that this Bill has some very scary things in it; including the loss of private property and the loss of the ‘rule of law’, the system that has been in place for hundreds of years to keep the state from abusing its power. It would only be a matter of time before these barbaric methods of control would be extended to health products, making all of us who choose herbs over prescriptions perspective criminals.
In response to this Bill and the NHP regulations, Buckley along with his colleagues Peter Helgrasson and Tiffany Sampson have formed the Natural Health Products Protection Agency (NHPPA). “We formed the NHPPA because the existing groups were not bringing enough attention to the issue.” The NHPPA provides a legitimate and credible analysis of documents like Bill C-51 and sets up a process that other groups can use to help spread information. Buckley grins as he mentions the time the Minister of Health called him a “scoundrel” in the National Post. Now if that isn’t evidence that they are on the right track, I don’t know what is.
Saturday, September 6, 2008
Lemon joy cookies
1 cup soft butter
21/2 cups spelt flour
1 cup arrowroot starch flour
1 tbsp baking powder
½ cup honey
¼ cup plain soy milk
1 tbsp lemon zest
1 tbsp fresh lemon juice
Preheat the oven to 350 degrees. In a medium bowl, mix all ingredients into the butter in the order shown. Roll into small balls and press with thumb on a baking tray. Bake for about 15 minutes. Let them melt on your tongue.
21/2 cups spelt flour
1 cup arrowroot starch flour
1 tbsp baking powder
½ cup honey
¼ cup plain soy milk
1 tbsp lemon zest
1 tbsp fresh lemon juice
Preheat the oven to 350 degrees. In a medium bowl, mix all ingredients into the butter in the order shown. Roll into small balls and press with thumb on a baking tray. Bake for about 15 minutes. Let them melt on your tongue.
greens+ energy treats
2 cup dates
1 1/3 cup raw almonds
1-2 tbsp honey
4 scoops ‘greens+ kids’
Shredded coconut
Use a food processor to chop the dates and almonds very fine. Pour the mixture into a bowl and add the honey (the honey is there to help the mixture stick together – use only the amount that you need) and greens+ powder. Use your hands to form the mixture into small balls and roll in the coconut until they are coated. Put the balls in a freezer-safe container and eat cold on a hot day!
1 1/3 cup raw almonds
1-2 tbsp honey
4 scoops ‘greens+ kids’
Shredded coconut
Use a food processor to chop the dates and almonds very fine. Pour the mixture into a bowl and add the honey (the honey is there to help the mixture stick together – use only the amount that you need) and greens+ powder. Use your hands to form the mixture into small balls and roll in the coconut until they are coated. Put the balls in a freezer-safe container and eat cold on a hot day!
Love is in the air
Perfume sales are extremely high this week. Why is this? It’s because people have come to understand the intense connection between smell and romance. I am not talking about the pheromone-scent that is given off by the opposite sex and that lures us in without being consciously aware (and which cheesy infomercials say you can now buy to help make your wildest dreams come true!). I am referring to the scents around us that we can choose to use to our advantage.
Our olfactory nerves connect directly to the limbic brain where many of our emotions and memories are stored. Because of this, a scent can instantly trigger a very vivid memory or conversely, serve to make you unforgettable. Perfume manufacturers know this, and include a variety of odd notes to create signature scents that will appeal on a chemical level to a wide mix of people. You don’t need to buy an expensive label to get this effect though; you can do it yourself with a few oils and spices.
There are many essential oils that are reported to have aphrodisiac qualities. One that you’ll find in most blends is ylang-ylang. Its scent is hard to classify as it is floral, yet spicy, rich and sweet. Because of this it is used extensively in cosmetics, soaps, bubble baths, etc. There is a tradition in Indonesia to spread these flowers on the bed of a newly married couple. Ylang-ylang’s reputation as an aphrodisiac may come from its healing affects on the nervous system: neutralizing stress, depression and tension. Its beneficial affects on the circulatory system probably help in this respect too. The writer of one aromatherapy book stated that this oil “soothes and inhibits anger born of frustration.”
In one large survey done with men of a variety of ages, it was discovered that the scent most likely to arouse young men is cinnamon. In older men the most attractive smell is vanilla. Don’t ask me where the cut off is between the two! It kind of makes you want to bake something though, doesn’t it?
I have written extensively on cinnamon as it relates to blood sugar and how it heals the digestive system, but never on the perks it could have for your love life. Cinnamon is recognized as a general stimulant, encouraging good circulation and overall health. Like ylang-ylang, it helps the body deal with stress more efficiently, easing nervous tension and exhaustion. The two oils complement each other rather well and are often paired together in perfume blends. One note of caution is that cinnamon oil can irritate the skin and should only be used well diluted with some form of carrier oil (grapeseed oil works very well for massage) or unscented lotion.
Vanilla is harder to find good information on as it is usually not considered a true aromatherapy oil. The scent is very relaxing and will usually evoke pleasant memories. People report a sense of being transported “home” when they breathe it in.
Many other oils fall into this category, including rose, neroli, jasmine, and plain old black pepper. Whether you choose to add these scents to oil for a special massage, diffuse them through the room to set the atmosphere, wear them on your skin as your own unique perfume, or create a meal with attention to spices, the results are sure to be spectacular.
Our olfactory nerves connect directly to the limbic brain where many of our emotions and memories are stored. Because of this, a scent can instantly trigger a very vivid memory or conversely, serve to make you unforgettable. Perfume manufacturers know this, and include a variety of odd notes to create signature scents that will appeal on a chemical level to a wide mix of people. You don’t need to buy an expensive label to get this effect though; you can do it yourself with a few oils and spices.
There are many essential oils that are reported to have aphrodisiac qualities. One that you’ll find in most blends is ylang-ylang. Its scent is hard to classify as it is floral, yet spicy, rich and sweet. Because of this it is used extensively in cosmetics, soaps, bubble baths, etc. There is a tradition in Indonesia to spread these flowers on the bed of a newly married couple. Ylang-ylang’s reputation as an aphrodisiac may come from its healing affects on the nervous system: neutralizing stress, depression and tension. Its beneficial affects on the circulatory system probably help in this respect too. The writer of one aromatherapy book stated that this oil “soothes and inhibits anger born of frustration.”
In one large survey done with men of a variety of ages, it was discovered that the scent most likely to arouse young men is cinnamon. In older men the most attractive smell is vanilla. Don’t ask me where the cut off is between the two! It kind of makes you want to bake something though, doesn’t it?
I have written extensively on cinnamon as it relates to blood sugar and how it heals the digestive system, but never on the perks it could have for your love life. Cinnamon is recognized as a general stimulant, encouraging good circulation and overall health. Like ylang-ylang, it helps the body deal with stress more efficiently, easing nervous tension and exhaustion. The two oils complement each other rather well and are often paired together in perfume blends. One note of caution is that cinnamon oil can irritate the skin and should only be used well diluted with some form of carrier oil (grapeseed oil works very well for massage) or unscented lotion.
Vanilla is harder to find good information on as it is usually not considered a true aromatherapy oil. The scent is very relaxing and will usually evoke pleasant memories. People report a sense of being transported “home” when they breathe it in.
Many other oils fall into this category, including rose, neroli, jasmine, and plain old black pepper. Whether you choose to add these scents to oil for a special massage, diffuse them through the room to set the atmosphere, wear them on your skin as your own unique perfume, or create a meal with attention to spices, the results are sure to be spectacular.
Bill C-51
I am always curious as to how certain pieces of legislature come about. The proposed Bill C-51 for instance, that is causing ripples of protest throughout the natural health field.
According the Government of Canada website Bill C-51 is; “An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, was introduced in the House of Commons on 8 April 2008. Among other things, the bill creates new offences relating to food, therapeutic products (a new term used in the bill that includes drugs) and cosmetics, requires licenses for importing food and for interprovincial trade in food, and makes amendments to the licensing of therapeutic products.” The claim is that this radical reformation of the current Food and Drug Act will help keep people safer.
In 2004 regulations were put into place to make sure that all manufacturers of herbs and vitamins meet certain standards. Many smaller companies were unable to afford the money and time needed to get this status, and as a result have disappeared from the market. Others have repeatedly been told to revamp their applications so that even four years later, their status is still dubious.
According to many of the petitions I’ve been asked to sign to stop this from being passed however, up to 60-75 percent of our natural health products could become outlawed and parents who give herbs and vitamins to children without the express permission of a medical doctor could be criminals. The new bill would replace the word “drug” as it appears throughout the Act, with the term “therapeutic product”, thus leaving all plant-based remedies under the same control as pharmaceuticals.
I don’t like to be alarmist and claims that I have read online about this Bill allowing the government to seize your assets, raid your home or business and throw you into jail for the heinous crime of making an herbal tincture seem like they may be exaggerated.
But as I write this, I am sitting in my yard, watching my herbs grow strong in the sunlight, and I wonder where the line between food and medicine will be drawn. For example, if I pick dandelion leaves out of my lawn and put them into a salad as a tonic for my liver, is that food or medicine? If I make my own salve using calendula flowers and give a jar to a friend as a gift, am I now manufacturing and bottling a drug? I’ve never thought of myself as the criminal type, but if teas made from my garden are suddenly banned I may find myself running a hippie-based black market! The implications are a little too Orwellian for my taste.
There are plenty of resources out there for people who would like to know more about this and try to make a difference. One is through Health Action Network (HANS) who is trying to be a voice for the health-conscious in Canada. They publish a great little magazine and are always looking for new members to spread the word www.hans.org There are also an abundance of online petitions you can sign, or drafts of letters you can download and send in to make your voice heard.
If worse comes to worse, I’ll save a bottle of echinacea for you.
According the Government of Canada website Bill C-51 is; “An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts, was introduced in the House of Commons on 8 April 2008. Among other things, the bill creates new offences relating to food, therapeutic products (a new term used in the bill that includes drugs) and cosmetics, requires licenses for importing food and for interprovincial trade in food, and makes amendments to the licensing of therapeutic products.” The claim is that this radical reformation of the current Food and Drug Act will help keep people safer.
In 2004 regulations were put into place to make sure that all manufacturers of herbs and vitamins meet certain standards. Many smaller companies were unable to afford the money and time needed to get this status, and as a result have disappeared from the market. Others have repeatedly been told to revamp their applications so that even four years later, their status is still dubious.
According to many of the petitions I’ve been asked to sign to stop this from being passed however, up to 60-75 percent of our natural health products could become outlawed and parents who give herbs and vitamins to children without the express permission of a medical doctor could be criminals. The new bill would replace the word “drug” as it appears throughout the Act, with the term “therapeutic product”, thus leaving all plant-based remedies under the same control as pharmaceuticals.
I don’t like to be alarmist and claims that I have read online about this Bill allowing the government to seize your assets, raid your home or business and throw you into jail for the heinous crime of making an herbal tincture seem like they may be exaggerated.
But as I write this, I am sitting in my yard, watching my herbs grow strong in the sunlight, and I wonder where the line between food and medicine will be drawn. For example, if I pick dandelion leaves out of my lawn and put them into a salad as a tonic for my liver, is that food or medicine? If I make my own salve using calendula flowers and give a jar to a friend as a gift, am I now manufacturing and bottling a drug? I’ve never thought of myself as the criminal type, but if teas made from my garden are suddenly banned I may find myself running a hippie-based black market! The implications are a little too Orwellian for my taste.
There are plenty of resources out there for people who would like to know more about this and try to make a difference. One is through Health Action Network (HANS) who is trying to be a voice for the health-conscious in Canada. They publish a great little magazine and are always looking for new members to spread the word www.hans.org There are also an abundance of online petitions you can sign, or drafts of letters you can download and send in to make your voice heard.
If worse comes to worse, I’ll save a bottle of echinacea for you.
Dial "D" for danger!
In your car, on they way to work, you see someone in front of you weaving a bit on the road. Not enough that you would classify it as “dangerous” perhaps, but enough that you’re a little nervous about passing them. As you drive past, you see the cell-phone in hand.
Admit it, we all do it every once and awhile and we all know that it’s dangerous. Did you know that it can be dangerous to use a cell while walking? A new study conducted with children age 8-10 using a virtual reality simulator showed that kids were significantly more likely to get hit by a virtual car when crossing the street when they were on a phone. The researchers concluded that the accident rate would be even higher if the person the kids were talking to on the phone was a best-friend, a cute boy or a parent they were in conflict with, rather than an unknown expert. The really scary news is that the confusion and bad decision making, for both children and drivers, lasts for several minutes longer than the phone call goes on. Could there be something more dangerous than just distraction going on here?
Many have heard that call -phones could cause cancer. Most of the health concerns are based on the fact that cell-phones use electro-magnetic radiation in the microwave range. Trust me, I am heavily aware of the irony in the fact that I stopped using a microwave and started using a cell-phone at pretty much the same time in my life! The World Health Organization has declared that there is no real evidence proving ill-effects from cell-phones or their base towers and appears to be highly critical of any studies that might state otherwise.
And yet, there are some compelling studies out there. Some scientists claim that they have lost funding and support form multinational corporations due to their findings. “Professor Ross Adey, a biologist, had his funding withdrawn by Motorola before completing research which showed that mobiles affected the number of brain tumors in animals. Dr. Henry Lai, who has been studying the biological effects of electromagnetic fields for 20 years, was asked three times to change findings on how they caused DNA breaks in rats.” (Fleming et al. “Cover-up claims over mobile phone danger.” Express Newspapers, May 24, 1999). These two scientists found that someone else was interested in their research. Many of their observations on the health effects of EMFs have been used in increasing the military’s understanding of these potential weapons applications (Earth Rising – The Revolution: Toward a Thousand Years of Peace. by Dr. Nick Begich and James Roderick, January 2000). I’m claiming all my sources here because I know this is a touchy subject and I want people to look into this more themselves.
There is a lot of information out there about the dangers of cell-phones, but not a lot of suggestions for reducing risks. Research suggests keeping phones away from areas that are particularly sensitive such as the heart, ovaries, and testis. Mushrooms such as maitake and reishi have been shown to help the body deal with certain frequencies. All herbs and foods that aid the nervous system, especially those that protect the myelin sheath such as lecithin, can be helpful as well. There are even devices that can be placed on the phone to reduce the negative affect.
Sometimes in studies, the affects on human tissues can seem insignificant because they only look at cell-phone radiation and only for a limited period of time. In real life however, most people in our society are now exposed to these waves from cell-phones on the road, cordless phones at home and work, micro waved food on the table and wireless internet on their laps! All those little bits probably add up after a time, don’t you think?
Admit it, we all do it every once and awhile and we all know that it’s dangerous. Did you know that it can be dangerous to use a cell while walking? A new study conducted with children age 8-10 using a virtual reality simulator showed that kids were significantly more likely to get hit by a virtual car when crossing the street when they were on a phone. The researchers concluded that the accident rate would be even higher if the person the kids were talking to on the phone was a best-friend, a cute boy or a parent they were in conflict with, rather than an unknown expert. The really scary news is that the confusion and bad decision making, for both children and drivers, lasts for several minutes longer than the phone call goes on. Could there be something more dangerous than just distraction going on here?
Many have heard that call -phones could cause cancer. Most of the health concerns are based on the fact that cell-phones use electro-magnetic radiation in the microwave range. Trust me, I am heavily aware of the irony in the fact that I stopped using a microwave and started using a cell-phone at pretty much the same time in my life! The World Health Organization has declared that there is no real evidence proving ill-effects from cell-phones or their base towers and appears to be highly critical of any studies that might state otherwise.
And yet, there are some compelling studies out there. Some scientists claim that they have lost funding and support form multinational corporations due to their findings. “Professor Ross Adey, a biologist, had his funding withdrawn by Motorola before completing research which showed that mobiles affected the number of brain tumors in animals. Dr. Henry Lai, who has been studying the biological effects of electromagnetic fields for 20 years, was asked three times to change findings on how they caused DNA breaks in rats.” (Fleming et al. “Cover-up claims over mobile phone danger.” Express Newspapers, May 24, 1999). These two scientists found that someone else was interested in their research. Many of their observations on the health effects of EMFs have been used in increasing the military’s understanding of these potential weapons applications (Earth Rising – The Revolution: Toward a Thousand Years of Peace. by Dr. Nick Begich and James Roderick, January 2000). I’m claiming all my sources here because I know this is a touchy subject and I want people to look into this more themselves.
There is a lot of information out there about the dangers of cell-phones, but not a lot of suggestions for reducing risks. Research suggests keeping phones away from areas that are particularly sensitive such as the heart, ovaries, and testis. Mushrooms such as maitake and reishi have been shown to help the body deal with certain frequencies. All herbs and foods that aid the nervous system, especially those that protect the myelin sheath such as lecithin, can be helpful as well. There are even devices that can be placed on the phone to reduce the negative affect.
Sometimes in studies, the affects on human tissues can seem insignificant because they only look at cell-phone radiation and only for a limited period of time. In real life however, most people in our society are now exposed to these waves from cell-phones on the road, cordless phones at home and work, micro waved food on the table and wireless internet on their laps! All those little bits probably add up after a time, don’t you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
